EnergyPassport enters the deal at the proposal stage - a verification commitment that goes in the credit package before construction starts, and delivers independent oversight for the life of the asset.
No independent verification at commissioning. No ongoing performance data. No early warning on degradation. Developers seeking financing have no way to promise continuous third-party oversight - because nothing like it exists.
After the IE snapshot, you have no third-party visibility into asset performance. The operator self-reports quarterly. You're underwriting blind.
See lender solution →Building a new project? Your lender gets an IE report before close and then nothing. A Verification Commitment Letter in the credit package changes that. Operating asset? Prove performance with verified data to refinance.
See operator solution →Was it the installation, the cells, or the BMS software? Neither side has evidence. You're spending on lawyers instead of answers.
See EPC solution →A bankability instrument that enters the deal at the proposal stage. Before construction, a Verification Commitment Letter goes in the credit package. At commissioning, a baseline report confirms nameplate specs. Post-close, continuous verified reports go directly to the lender. A contractual commitment backed by physics-based validation, cryptographic signing, and tamper-evident records.
Electrolyzer performance verification for IRA 45V and Canada Clean Hydrogen ITC compliance. Same dual-telemetry engine - electricity input vs. hydrogen output, verified against conservation laws.
The same verification methodology transfers to any energy asset where input and output can be independently measured. We're expanding the platform as we prove out the core engine on BESS and hydrogen.
Higher DSCRs. Wider spreads. Shorter tenors. Conservative reserves. These are rational responses to performance uncertainty - but they cost money on every deal.
We'll send you our methodology overview and a sample EnergyPassport report.